Hey DM, will echocfg.exe be ever integrated into the scfg.exe?
Re: Echocfg
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed Sep 18 2019 07:44 pm
I don't have any plans to do that. <shrug>
digital man
This Is Spinal Tap quote #6:
David St. Hubbins: He was the patron saint of quality footwear.
Norco, CA WX: 67.1øF, 64.0% humidity, 5 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
Re: Echocfg
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed Sep 18 2019 07:44 pm
I don't have any plans to do that. <shrug>
digital man
This Is Spinal Tap quote #6:
David St. Hubbins: He was the patron saint of quality footwear.
Norco, CA WX: 67.1øF, 64.0% humidity, 5 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
Re: Echocfg
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed Sep 18 2019 07:44 pm
I don't have any plans to do that. <shrug>
May I ask why?
Is there a reason that this cannot be integrated?
By: The Millionaire to Digital Man on Wed Sep 18 2019 07:44 pm
Hey DM, will echocfg.exe be ever integrated into the scfg.exe?
I don't have any plans to do that. <shrug>
On 09-18-19 21:27, The Millionaire wrote to Digital Man <=-
Most BBSes including Mystic have this built into the main configuration setup. Your BBS is the first to have it separate for some reason.
On 09-18-19 21:27, The Millionaire wrote to Digital Man <=-
I'd question that. For many years, one usually had to use a separate BBS, tosser and mailer, meaning at least 3 separate configurations to maintain. Sure, more packages are all in one, but personally I don't care thatEchocfg is separate. Everything works.
... Life is not a cabaret, it's a circus!
=== MultiMail/Win v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
* Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
Well if it was my BBS, I would most likely integrate it into the main configuration so everything would be in one place to find.
Well then it is a good thing that it isn't your bbs.
|15frank |08// |15netsurge
|07disksh0p|08!|07bbs |08% |07bbs.diskshop.ca |08% |07mystic goodness |11SciNet |03ftn hq |08% |07https://diskshop.ca/scinet
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/02 (Linux/64)
* Origin: % disksh0p!bbs % bbs.diskshop.ca % SciNet ftn hq % (1:229/101)
Well if it was my BBS, I would most likely integrate it into the main configuration so everything would be in one place to find.
Most BBSes including Mystic have this built into the main
configuration setup. Your BBS is the first to have it separate for
some reason.
I'd question that. For many years, one usually had to use a separate
BBS, tosser and mailer, meaning at least 3 separate configurations to maintain.
Sure, more packages are all in one, but personally I don't care thatEchocfg is separate. Everything works.
Re: Re: Echocfg
By: The Millionaire to Tony Langdon on Thu Sep 19 2019 05:01 am
The src code is available. Knock yourself out!
---
þ Synchronet þ Pure Threadripper. --==={bbs.echto.net}===--
The Millionaire wrote to Netsurge <=-
Well then it is a good thing that it isn't your bbs.
What if it was? Maybe I should start studying some code and write
my own bbs. That would be so cool. Something I always wanted to
do and never had the chance or the time.
Re: Echocfg
I don't have any plans to do that. <shrug>
May I ask why? Is there a reason that this cannot be integrated?
Sounds like a great idea - develop a fork of Synchronet and make
it all your own.
You could call it "Who Wants To Be The Millionaire".
Or just "WWTBTM" for short.
Nightfox wrote to Gamgee <=-
Sounds like a great idea - develop a fork of Synchronet and make
it all your own.
You could call it "Who Wants To Be The Millionaire".
Or just "WWTBTM" for short.
Or perhaps, since it would be a fork of Synchronet, it could be
called "The Millionet". It could be pronounced the English way
as it's spelled or perhaps the French way ("The Millionay").
On 09-19-19 05:01, The Millionaire wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
Well if it was my BBS, I would most likely integrate it into the main configuration so everything would be in one place to find.
On 09-19-19 12:58, mark lewis wrote to Tony Langdon <=-
4 if you also use a file/TIC processor... asetup is the allfix config
tool i used to use on my old system ;)
Sure, more packages are all in one, but personally I don't care thatEchocfg is separate. Everything works.
i rather prefer to have separate configuration tools but will take what the package(s) i choose to run provide...
On 09-18-19 21:27, The Millionaire wrote to Digital Man <=-
I'd question that. For many years, one usually had to use a separate BBS, tosser and mailer, meaning at least 3 separate configurations to maintain. Sure, more packages are all in one, but personally I don't care thatEchocf is separate. Everything works.
... Life is not a cabaret, it's a circus!
=== MultiMail/Win v0.51
--- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux
* Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)
Well if it was my BBS, I would most likely integrate it into the main configuration so everything would be in one place to find.
Well then it is a good thing that it isn't your bbs.
|15frank |08// |15netsurge
|07disksh0p|08!|07bbs |08% |07bbs.diskshop.ca |08% |07mystic goodness |11SciNet |03ftn hq |08% |07https://diskshop.ca/scinet
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/02 (Linux/64)
* Origin: % disksh0p!bbs % bbs.diskshop.ca % SciNet ftn hq % (1:229/101)
What if it was? Maybe I should start studying some code and write my own bbs That would be so cool. Something I always wanted to do and never had the cha or the time.
Re: Re: Echocfg
By: The Millionaire to Tony Langdon on Thu Sep 19 2019 05:01 am
I understand where you are coming from but people are already saying how complicated synchronet is, so that would add fuel to the fire.
---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
I understand where you are coming from but people are already saying how complicated synchronet is, so that would add fuel to the fire.
Oh I agree there for sure. Synchronet is the most complicated bbs I have eve configured in my life.
I understand where you are coming from but people are already saying how complicated synchronet is, so that would add fuel to the fire.
Oh I agree there for sure. Synchronet is the most complicated bbs I have eve configured in my life.
Re: Re: Echocfg
By: MRO to The Millionaire on Sat Sep 21 2019 05:14 am
I understand where you are coming from but people are already saying how complicated synchronet is, so that would add fuel to the fire.
Oh I agree there for sure. Synchronet is the most complicated bbs I ha eve configured in my life.
Seriously? Compared to what?
Sysop: | echicken |
---|---|
Location: | Toronto, Ontario |
Users: | 2,224 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 220:54:14 |
Calls: | 14,143 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 295 |
Messages: | 551,181 |