• Re: What is the difference between a regular Format and a Low Level Fo

    From G6JPG-255@255soft.uk@1:124/5013 to All on Fri Feb 1 00:16:25 2019
    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.o rg!.POSTED!not-for-mail
    From: "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG-255@255soft.uk>
    Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
    Subject: Re: What is the difference between a regular Format and a Low Level Format?
    Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:17:51 +0000
    Organization: 255 software
    Lines: 37
    Message-ID: <jIhYQrDvOhFaFwvr@soft255.demon.co.uk>
    References: <191c1dtfqsvlh4uvv13oo23tul3j6jobq4@4ax.com>
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
    Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0a40a0c928db38b07310d8c1ae6cd22c";
    logging-data="15264"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Ryg0TuSMJTonTuMoQXoQS"
    User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M (<vXkDLsXH8kSh9BEguRZACQo$4J>)
    Cancel-Lock: sha1:7jMgv+U/cqReypRzcRihbibMMIY=
    Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:134674

    In message <191c1dtfqsvlh4uvv13oo23tul3j6jobq4@4ax.com>,
    james@nospam.com writes:
    What is the difference between a regular Format and a Low Level Format?

    I have a program to do Low Level Formats.
    I had a flash drive that somehow got screwed up. A regular format did
    not fix it, but a low level format got it working again.

    For disc (partition)s: it used to be that a "quick" format just deletes
    the entries in the root directory, thus making the disc (partition) look
    as if it has nothing on it (including sub-folders), whereas a full one actually did some sort of test on every sector, so that dud ones could
    be marked as bad and avoided (by in effect making notes of the dud ones
    on the disc somewhere). For modern discs where the disc firmware itself
    has something that does that, it at least exercises the disc.

    I'm not sure if "quick/full" is the same as "regular/low-level".

    For a floppy, a full format also in effect wrote something on the disc
    that was of use during subsequent operations, rather like drawing lines
    on a sheet of paper before you use it; a "low level" format of a hard
    disc used to do something similar, but again, in modern HDs that's
    probably done before it leaves the manufacturer and isn't really doable
    by the user.

    For your flash drive, I'm _guessing_ that the quick format - if that's
    what you did - just did in effect a "del /s *.*", which wouldn't have
    fixed it if the part that stored the root directory was corrupted,
    whereas the low-level format would have re-initialised it.

    But someone - Paul probably - will be along in a moment to say more than
    just my guesses (-:.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Reality television. It's eroding the ability of good scripted television to survive. - Patrick Duffy in Radio Times 2-8 February 2013
    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.1
    * Origin: Prison Board BBS Mesquite Tx //telnet.RDFIG.NET www. (1:124/5013)